As those who’ve listened to my latest podcast will know, I’ve been in contemplative mood this week. No, not about a certain election result, but the definition of evidence-based investing.
The question has come into sharper focus with the inaugural Evidence-Based Investing Conference in New York City just a few days away.
One of many like-minded people I’m looking forward to meeting there is Phil Huber, Chief Investment Officer for Huber Financial Advisors, based in Chicago.
Phil has just written this excellent description of the fundamental differences between conventional investors and evidence-based investors. It really is spot on.
Phil Huber: A Tale of Two Investors
Related posts:
Podcast Episode 2: What’s with the name?
What sort of evidence should investors rely on?
The sort of “evidence” investors should ignore
ROBIN POWELL is a freelance journalist and the founding editor of The Evidence-Based Investor. Based in Birmingham, England, he founded Ember Television and Regis Media, and he specialties in helping disruptive financial firms to grow. He also campaigns for a fair, transparent and sustainable investing industry. You can follow him on Twitter at @RobinJPowell.
COPYRIGHT
Regis Media owns the copyright to all of TEBI’s content, and republishing any of it without permission is strictly prohibited. We will take appropriate action in the event of any infringements.
Financial advisers may wish to note that we allow selected firms to use our investor education content under licence, and that we also produce original and customised articles and videos. Visit our website for further information.
Robin is a journalist and campaigner for positive change in global investing. He runs Regis Media, a niche provider of content marketing for financial advice firms with an evidence-based investment philosophy. He also works as a consultant to other disruptive firms in the investing sector.
