top of page

Should the growth of indexing concern investors?

  • Writer: Robin Powell
    Robin Powell
  • Feb 14
  • 3 min read


The popularity of indexing has grown dramatically in recent years. Some financial commentators even claim we are heading for an indexing bubble.


But according to TIM EDWARDS from S&P Dow Jones Indices, such fears are misplaced.

Investing passively simply means holding a broad market portfolio. It does not distort markets or inflate prices artificially.






KEY TAKEAWAYS


1. Indexing reflects the market, it does not distort it


Passive funds allocate capital according to each stock’s market size. Smaller companies receive less money, larger ones more. This market-tracking approach does not favour any one asset unfairly.


2. Passive investing is not driving bubbles


There is no evidence that indexing has caused any speculative bubbles. While markets do experience volatility, broad-based index investing has not been the trigger.


3. Index funds passed the Covid stress test


During the Covid-19 shock in 2020, most passive investors did not panic. Markets stayed functional, and index funds helped facilitate major reallocations without instability.



RELATED CONTENT 






STILL ON THE SIDELINES?


The sooner you begin investing, the more time your money has to grow through the power of compounding. Every day you wait is a missed opportunity.


Because it’s free of charge for DIY investors, our favourite platform is InvestEngine. There are no hidden fees: you only pay the expense ratios of whichever ETFs you invest in.


TEBI readers who start investing with InvestEngine receive a welcome bonus of up to £100. The minimum initial investment amount is £100. 


To claim your bonus, click on this link or use the promo code TEBI.


Your future self will thank you.




TRANSCRIPT


Robin Powell: Index investing has grown hugely in popularity over the years. 


In fact, some commentators are warning there’s an index investing bubble.


But Tim Edwards from S&P Dow Jones Indices says that’s somewhat missing the point.


Tim Edwards: Passive investing, by definition, is whole market investing. 


You're not putting more money in Apple or in Microsoft or in any other stock, compared to its capacity to absorb your investment.


So smaller stocks get a smaller bit of your money. Bigger stocks get a bigger part of your money. So bubbles certainly exist in stock markets. 


They're easiest to spot in hindsight, but there's no evidence that broad based passive investing is what's driving them. 


And in fact, it's very difficult to see that happening. 


RP: Just to clarify, all equity investing is intrinsically risky. But that is unconnected with the growth of indexing.


TE: Of course, it's a very different question. 


There are today or tomorrow. Are equities in total overvalued? If they are, it's not because of passive investors. 


All the passive investors are doing is they're tracking the whole market. 


And if you are a passive investor, you shouldn't be worried about more people following the same strategy that you are. 


RP: Another concern that’s been expressed about the growth of passive ETFs in particular is that, because they’re liquid investment vehicles that can be traded quickly and easily, investors will be tempted to rush for the exits when markets fall sharply.


But that’s not what happened in March 2020, for example, when stock prices plummeted as news emerged about the Covid-19 pandemic.


TE: Well, in hindsight, I think we can make a couple of observations. 


The first is that passive investors themselves didn't rush for the exits. And in fact, this shouldn't be surprising because many passive investors are there for the long term rather than trying to time the market. 


The second thing that we noticed was again, towards volatility.


It was tougher trading conditions, but overall the markets didn't break. 


It kept functioning. And in fact, what we saw was an incredibly astonishing amount of capital being transferred, being reallocated, being readjusted as institutional investors and active managers adjusted their exposures. 


Many of them used index products in order to do that. 


And overall, I think in hindsight we can say the system really worked and dealt with an extraordinary volatility and change in news flow, very effectively. 


RP: So, yes, there have been scare stories about passive investing. But they don’t stand up to close scrutiny.


There’s no evidence yet that indexing poses a systemic problem, or that index investors are exposed to any more risk than investors using actively managed funds.


Regis Media Logo

The Evidence-Based Investor is produced by Regis Media, a specialist provider of content marketing for evidence-based advisers.
Contact Regis Media

  • LinkedIn
  • X
  • Facebook
  • Instagram
  • Youtube
  • TikTok

All content is for informational purposes only. We make no representations as to the accuracy, completeness, suitability or validity of any information on this site and will not be liable for any errors or omissions or any damages arising from its display or use.

Full disclaimer.

© 2025 The Evidence-Based Investor. All rights reserved.

bottom of page